Iowa 2024: Daniel Graben Case - Guilty Plea & Sentencing Details
Is it possible for a single act to irrevocably alter the course of a life, leading to a decade behind bars? The case of Daniel Graben, a man from Sioux City, Iowa, presents a stark illustration of this very notion, a narrative woven with threads of poor choices and severe consequences.
The legal saga surrounding Daniel Graben has unfolded in the heartland of America, specifically within the jurisdiction of the Northern District of Iowa. This case is a somber reminder of the weight of individual actions and the repercussions they can unleash. The initial stages involved a report and recommendation to accept a guilty plea related to Count 1 of the indictment, a decision overseen by Chief Magistrate Judge Kelly K.E. Objections to this recommendation were due by August 1, 2024, marking a critical point in the legal proceedings.
Graben's story, while not entirely unique, underscores the often-unseen intersection of personal choices and the law. Public records, including those from social media platforms like Facebook, suggest a life that has been touched by the complexities of modern life. The availability of such information allows for a more complete understanding of the individual behind the headlines, adding layers of context to the legal narrative.
- Corbin Fisher Connor Hot Gay Porn Scenes Videos Watch Now
- Burden Of Truth A Legal Drama Watch Buy Now
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Full Name | Daniel Graben |
| Age (as of sentencing) | 60 years old (Born October 7, 1964) |
| Residence | Sioux City, Iowa |
| Previous Residences | New Plymouth, ID; Vancouver, WA; Eureka, CA |
| Aliases | Daniel L Graben, Daniel R Graben, Daniel D Graben, Dan Graben, Dan Graber |
| Date of Guilty Plea | July 18, 2024 |
| Charges | Possession of a firearm by a felon; Possession of an explosive by a felon; Receipt and possession of an unregistered firearm; Making an unregistered firearm. |
| Sentencing | 120 months (10 years) imprisonment |
| Sentencing Date | December 5, 2024 |
| Sentencing Judge | Leonard T. Strand |
| Relevant Incident | Building and firing two improvised explosive missiles, causing a fire on February 28, 2022, in Plymouth County. |
| Prior Felony Conviction | Yes |
| Facebook Profile | Search on Facebook |
The path that led to this outcome began with a series of events that unfolded in rural Plymouth County on February 28, 2022. On that morning, a resident observed what he believed to be a "low flying mortar" over his property. This initial observation would soon become part of a much larger investigation that would ultimately ensnare Graben. The investigation, as it deepened, uncovered the extent of Graben's actions, including the construction and detonation of two improvised explosive missiles. These actions resulted in a grass fire, amplifying the seriousness of the situation.
The legal proceedings against Graben accelerated throughout 2024. On July 18, 2024, Graben entered a guilty plea to a charge of possession of a firearm by a felon. This plea agreement stipulated a recommended sentence. The case moved forward, culminating in the sentencing on December 5, 2024. The sentencing was handed down by United States District Court Judge Leonard T. Strand, resulting in a sentence of 10 years in federal prison. The U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Iowa, Timothy T., played a significant role in the prosecution. The judgment specifically addressed Count 1 of the indictment, which carried a penalty of 120 months imprisonment.
The cases progression also involved a report and recommendation to accept the guilty plea, with a deadline for objections set for August 1, 2024. This signifies the methodical process of the justice system, where every step is carefully documented and reviewed. The documentation, as evidenced by reports and recommendations signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Kelly K.E., forms the foundation of the legal record.
- Port Huron Mi History Maps Facts Your Guide To The Blue Water Area
- Damian Payne Career Family Tributes Latest Updates
The context of Graben's life adds a human dimension to the legal narrative. He is a 60-year-old man from Sioux City, Iowa. The records show he was born on October 7, 1964. His history includes residences in New Plymouth, ID, Vancouver, WA, and Eureka, CA. These details offer a glimpse into the journey of a man who has now found himself at the center of a federal case. Known by various names, including Daniel L Graben, Daniel R Graben, and Dan Graben, he also maintained a presence on social media platforms like Facebook, a reminder of the interconnectedness of modern life and the potential for public records to intersect with personal narratives. It is worth noting that this case underscores the potential for prior felony convictions to impact an individuals future, as possession of firearms and explosives is strictly prohibited for those with a criminal history.
The legal process itself is noteworthy. The plea agreement, and the ultimate sentencing, are testaments to the complexities of the justice system. It demonstrates how negotiations and assessments of evidence lead to consequences. The involvement of multiple legal figures, from the chief magistrate judge to the district court judge, highlights the collaborative nature of the process. The involvement of the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Iowa underscores the gravity of the charges and the commitment of federal law enforcement to prosecuting such cases.
The facts of the case are stark. Graben, with a prior felony conviction, built and fired two improvised explosive missiles. This action, resulting in a fire, escalated the severity of the situation. The charges included possession of a firearm by a felon, possession of an explosive by a felon, receipt and possession of an unregistered firearm, and making an unregistered firearm. The resulting ten-year prison sentence reflects the severity of these offenses, emphasizing the importance of respecting the law.
The case further raises questions about the role of individual choices and the potential for unexpected consequences. The act of constructing and detonating homemade explosives carries both immediate and far-reaching impacts. It not only led to the immediate danger of a fire but also triggered a series of legal actions that have now culminated in a lengthy prison sentence. In this case, the intersection of personal decisions and the law resulted in severe and lasting repercussions.
This story is more than just a series of legal proceedings. It's a snapshot of a life affected by choices, the legal system, and the community that surrounds it. Grabens story provides an insightful look into the interplay of personal actions, legal consequences, and the lasting impacts on individuals and communities. The case highlights the complex nature of law enforcement and legal processes in modern society.
The details that have emerged are not just the facts of a court case; they are pieces of a human narrative. Graben's life, marked by geographical movements and connections to family, friends, and communities, is now intertwined with the legal outcomes. The consequences of his actions are clear, and the ten-year prison sentence is a stark reminder of the weight carried by the law. For anyone looking for more information, public records, including court documents and social media profiles, are available to offer a better understanding of the man at the center of the narrative.
The case of Daniel Graben is a compelling study on the relationship between personal choices and legal consequences. The facts underscore the importance of responsible conduct and the long-term effects of breaking the law. The court's actions and the severe sentencing reinforce the serious legal and social implications that come with criminal activity, providing a reminder of the vital need for adhering to legal standards.
In summation, the Daniel Graben case from Sioux City, Iowa, highlights the dramatic consequences that can arise from individual choices. The details show a life now defined by the law. The ten-year federal prison sentence serves as a clear message about the importance of responsible conduct and adherence to legal guidelines. This case stands as a case study on the lasting impact of legal decisions and the significant ramifications of breaking federal laws.
Detail Author:
- Name : Brett Hyatt
- Username : monserrat42
- Email : pfannerstill.golda@lindgren.biz
- Birthdate : 1973-12-29
- Address : 7924 Syble Knoll South Marlee, IA 86063
- Phone : +12703491978
- Company : Lehner Inc
- Job : Cabinetmaker
- Bio : Odit deserunt labore provident sed ut perferendis est sunt. Esse aut asperiores rerum molestiae possimus illum et. Est ut doloribus quas sed cumque incidunt sed.
Socials
tiktok:
- url : https://tiktok.com/@makenzie.harvey
- username : makenzie.harvey
- bio : Tenetur et repellat itaque quibusdam et. Minus minima esse ad aut mollitia.
- followers : 1730
- following : 696
twitter:
- url : https://twitter.com/makenzie_real
- username : makenzie_real
- bio : Fuga iusto occaecati ut ut. Quia nihil dolorem est non. Animi dolorem est ab non. Est minima nemo itaque eum sunt. Corrupti nostrum qui et possimus ab.
- followers : 2654
- following : 2364
